Input EMI Filter & Damping
Is the input filter quiet enough, and will it stay stable with the converter behind it?
Could not save your rating. Try again.
Inputs
DCR, ESR and ESL
Loop crossover
Results
Checked: M ≥ 12 dB (design margin), failing below 6 dB (Kollman, Power Tip #4); checks |ZN| = Vin²/Pin, not ZD; with DCR 20 mΩ, ESR 5 mΩ, ESL 1 nH; assumes crossover above 66.4 kHz
Show working
- Filter corner
f_c = 1 / (2π√(L_f × C_f)) = 1 / (2π√(2.2 µH × 10 µF)) = 33.93 kHz - Converter input impedance
|Z_N| = V_in² / P_in = 24² / 26.7 = 21.57 Ω - Damping resistor
R_d = Z_0 × √((2 + n)(4 + 3n) / (2n²(4 + n))) = 0.4690 Ω × √(6 × 16 / (2 × 16 × 8)) = 0.2872 Ω, nearest E24 0.30 Ω - Stability margin
M = 20 × log10(|Z_N| / peak |Z_out|) = 20 × log10(21.57 Ω / 0.3432 Ω) = 35.97 dB
Rd to the nearest E24 value, Cd up to the next E12 value
All results (12)
Vin² / Pin, at the lowest input and full power
at 22.13 kHz
at 33.92 kHz, without the damping leg
without the damping leg
Z0 / (DCR + ESR)
the Erickson and Maksimović optimum
n × Cf
34.50 dB of margin, lossless and before rounding
40 log10(fsw / fc)
3.98 × fsw
Accuracy
- Erickson and Maksimović
- Perreault
Erickson and Maksimović, Fundamentals of Power Electronics the equation
Perreault, MIT 6.622 Power Electronics, input-filter damping the equation
Checked against: Middlebrook, Design Techniques for Preventing Input-Filter Oscillations in Switched-Mode Regulators, as cited by Kollman and by Erickson and Maksimović; Kollman, TI Power Tip #4, Damping an input filter, part 2
The converter is taken as the constant-power load −V_in²/P_in, which holds only well below its loop crossover. The C_f left after DC bias usually dominates the answer.
Most of the uncertainty comes from Filter capacitance (effective). Tighten that first.
2 independent cases. See the working.
This is a design aid. The engineer remains responsible for the design and for checking the standard itself.
Parameter sweep
Vary one input over a range and see the answer and verdict at each step, as a table and a curve.ProWorst-case corners
Put a tolerance on each input and get the worst-case band around the answer.ProCircuit
The principle
A switching converter that regulates its output draws constant power, so well below its loop crossover its input behaves as a negative resistance, −Vin²/Pin. The LC filter in front of it has a resonant peak in its output impedance. When that peak comes near the converter's input impedance, filter and converter can oscillate together (Middlebrook). This page checks the filter's attenuation at fsw, sizes an Rd–Cd damping leg across Cf, and compares the damped peak with |ZN| at the lowest input and full power.
- filter corner, Lf with Cf
- characteristic impedance of the filter
- filter Q from the series losses
- Cd / Cf, the damping capacitor over the filter capacitor
- damping leg across Cf
- converter input impedance with the output held by its loop: −Vin²/Pin, well below crossover
- converter input impedance with the duty cycle held
- filter output impedance, seen from the converter
- shunt branch: Cf and the damping leg in parallel
- your required attenuation at fsw
- stability margin
- self-resonant frequency of Cf with its ESL
- inductor resistance; capacitor resistance and inductance
More detail
Why a damping leg
An LC filter with low losses peaks at about Q × Z0 near fc. A resistor across Cf alone would damp it, but with the DC input across it, it would dissipate power all the time. In series with a blocking capacitor Cd it damps the peak and carries no DC. A larger n gives a lower peak, but a bigger Cd (Erickson and Maksimović).
Not modelled
ZD, the source's own impedance (taken as zero), the converter's input capacitance, Cd's own ESR and ESL (the leg is taken as an ideal Rd and Cd), and the ripple current in Cd. Above the loop crossover the converter's input is no longer −Vin²/Pin; enter the crossover to have the page check that the damped peak sits well below it.
Engine version 1.26.4